another aimless blog

yes, another blog to add to the millions out there already – but why not.

Mao Pow…er November 30, 2007

Filed under: Uncategorized — panthergirl @ 1:44 am
Tags:

Some old chinese propaganda posters – they're a bit of a mouthful.

American imperialism must be defeated. People of the world sure to be victorious.

Be ready to annihilate aggressors at any moment

Charge boldly against your enemy and ensure your bayonet gleams red with his blood. Only armies that dare to fight with bayonets are truly fierce. Bayonet fighting is a symbol of political and military quality in an army. Bloody bayonets are a symbol of a brave army.

With Mao Zedong thought as your guide, you will not lose your way as you navigate through the boundless sky.

 

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Advertisements
 

10 Responses to “Mao Pow…er”

  1. Wow…….bloody bayonets……………..wow

  2. Paxton Says:

    I agree, the bloody bayonetes one is creepy as hell.

  3. Crib Says:

    The Chinese always used great colours in their propaganda – a bit like your colours up top there – primary, strong. As for the bayonets, it is strongly symbolic. Some armies do their fighting remotely and don't have the stomach for the close stuff (we know an appropriate current example) but the Chinese know this and are playing on it – when an army is truly fighting for its country, the soldiers will fight with their bare hands if necessary.

  4. cat Says:

    his bayonet is not bloody yet – but he looks keen to get started.
    The colours are fantastic aren't they – the chinese (and japanese) are certainly not afraid of getting their hands dirty when the need arises.

  5. Waterbaby Says:

    are those your translations or caption commentary? battles fought hand-to-hand are a lot fairer and make a lot more sense to me than the computerized warfare of present day.

  6. cat Says:

    No not my translations – must give communist party credit for them. Hand to hand not very fair on the poor bastards doing it though.

  7. Waterbaby Says:

    Well, that was nice of the party to provide those. (chuckle). Um, yes, it is fair, from the broad overview and understanding of life.

  8. cat Says:

    what I mean is it'd be fairer if it were the politicians who decide on wars that were duking it out face to face – not the young guys they send to war.

  9. Waterbaby Says:

    ah, in which case, yes, i've had that same thought as well. but then (a) who would run their countries? the vice presidents (or replica thereof) on down the list ad infinitum till the entire government is gone? besides, it's the nature of the political beast to send any but itself off to do the dirty work.

  10. cat Says:

    yes – I wonder with how much ease though they would send their own sons and daughters


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s